1996 Audi RS2 vs. 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi RS2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi RS2 would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP @ 6075 RPM) has 958 more horse power than 1996 Audi RS2. (311 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 1996 Audi RS2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi RS2 weights approximately 345 kg more than 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero.
Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi RS2 | 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
Make | Audi | SSC |
Model | RS2 | Ultimate Aero |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 6350 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 1269 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6075 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1090 mm |