1996 Audi RS2 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi RS2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi RS2 would be higher. At 2,226 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi RS2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi RS2 (311 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi RS2 (410 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Audi RS2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi RS2 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | RS2 | Clio |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2480 mm |