1996 Audi S6 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1996 Audi S6 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,170 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi S6 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi S6 weights approximately 1149 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi S6 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Audi | DAF |
| Model | S6 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4170 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 33 L |
