1996 Audi S6 vs. 1977 Zastava 132

To start off, 1996 Audi S6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 4,170 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi S6 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1977 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1977 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi S6 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1977 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi S6 (420 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Zastava 132. 1996 Audi S6 has automatic transmission and 1977 Zastava 132 has manual transmission. 1977 Zastava 132 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Audi S6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: