1996 Audi S6 vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Audi S6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi S6 weights approximately 700 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Because 1996 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Mazda 626 has automatic transmission and 1996 Audi S6 has manual transmission. 1996 Audi S6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Mazda 626 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi S6 | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | S6 | 626 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2520 mm |