1996 Audi S6 vs. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1996 Audi S6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 4,171 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi S6 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi S6 weights approximately 608 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi S6 | 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | S6 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4171 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2580 mm |