1996 Audi S6 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1996 Audi S6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,171 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi S6 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi S6 weights approximately 990 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi S6 (420 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi S6 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | S6 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 4171 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2160 mm |
