1996 Audi S6 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1996 Audi S6 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi S6 (322 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 1996 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi S6 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Audi | Caterham |
| Model | S6 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.6:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 36 L |
