1996 Audi S6 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi S6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi S6 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi S6 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (212 HP @ 4450 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 595 kg more than 1996 Audi S6.
Because 1996 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi S6 (420 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Econoline. (393 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1996 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi S6 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | S6 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4171 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4450 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3510 mm |