1996 Audi S6 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi S6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi S6 would be higher. At 4,170 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi S6 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi S6 weights approximately 470 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi S6 (420 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 1996 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi S6 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | S6 | CU-X |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4170 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 80 L |