1996 Audi S6 vs. 2003 Mazda 6

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi S6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi S6 would be higher. At 4,170 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi S6 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi S6 weights approximately 470 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi S6 (420 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 1996 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications: