1996 Audi S6 vs. 2007 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2007 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi S6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi S6 would be higher. At 4,171 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi S6 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2007 Chrysler Sebring. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2007 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 1996 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Chrysler Sebring. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi S6 (420 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chrysler Sebring. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1996 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi S6 | 2007 Chrysler Sebring | |
| Make | Audi | Chrysler |
| Model | S6 | Sebring |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4171 cc | 2360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 225 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.1 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 21.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.3 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 64 L |
