1996 Audi S6 vs. 2007 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2007 Kia Sedona is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi S6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi S6 would be higher. At 4,171 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi S6 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2007 Kia Sedona. (244 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2007 Kia Sedona.
Because 1996 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Kia Sedona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi S6 (420 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Kia Sedona. (343 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Kia Sedona.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi S6 | 2007 Kia Sedona | |
Make | Audi | Kia |
Model | S6 | Sedona |
Year Released | 1996 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4171 cc | 3786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 343 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.4:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.3 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 80 L |