1996 Audi S6 vs. 2008 Saab 9-7X
To start off, 2008 Saab 9-7X is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi S6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi S6 would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Saab 9-7X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi S6 (335 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2008 Saab 9-7X. (300 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2008 Saab 9-7X.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Saab 9-7X (435 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Audi S6. (420 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2008 Saab 9-7X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Audi S6.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Audi S6 | 2008 Saab 9-7X | |
Make | Audi | Saab |
Model | S6 | 9-7X |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4171 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 420 Nm | 435 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.1 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.8 L/100km | 18.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.3 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 83 L |