1996 Audi S6 vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Audi S6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Audi S6 would be higher. At 4,171 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi S6 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Challenger. (247 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Challenger.
Because 1996 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Audi S6 (420 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Challenger. (250 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1996 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Audi S6 | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | Audi | Dodge |
| Model | S6 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4171 cc | 3518 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.1 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 21.8 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |
