1996 BMW 316 vs. 1962 Seat 600
To start off, 1996 BMW 316 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 316 (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1962 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 316 weights approximately 735 kg more than 1962 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 316 (150 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 316 | 1962 Seat 600 | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | 316 | 600 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2010 mm |