1996 BMW 332 vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1996 BMW 332 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 332 (323 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 472 kg more than 1996 BMW 332.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 332 | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
Make | BMW | Humber |
Model | 332 | Pullman |
Year Released | 1996 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 4085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 323 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 120 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 6.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 2032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3330 mm |