1996 BMW 332 vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1996 BMW 332 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW 332 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 332 (323 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 332 (350 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 332 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 332 | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | 332 | 140 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 323 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2620 mm |