1996 BMW 332 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 332 would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 332 (323 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (213 HP @ 2800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 885 kg more than 1996 BMW 332.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW 332. (350 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW 332.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 332 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 332 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 7275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 323 HP | 213 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 575 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 2445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3510 mm |