1996 BMW 332 vs. 2009 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2009 Lotus Evora is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 332 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 332 (323 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2009 Lotus Evora. (276 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 2009 Lotus Evora.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 332 (350 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lotus Evora. (342 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 332 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 332 | 2009 Lotus Evora | |
Make | BMW | Lotus |
Model | 332 | Evora |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 323 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2580 mm |