1996 BMW 332 vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 332 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW 332 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 332 (323 HP) has 162 more horse power than 2011 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW 332. (350 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW 332. 2011 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1996 BMW 332 has manual transmission. 1996 BMW 332 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW 332 | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | 332 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 323 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
