1996 BMW 520 vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 1996 BMW 520 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 520 weights approximately 261 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW 520 | 1951 Riley RM A | |
| Make | BMW | Riley |
| Model | 520 | RM A |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1496 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2870 mm |
