1996 BMW 520 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1996 BMW 520 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 520 (150 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 520 weights approximately 286 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 520 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 520 | Master RR |
Year Released | 1996 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 40 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1496 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |