1996 BMW 520 vs. 1982 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 1996 BMW 520 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 520 (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 520 (190 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW 520 | 1982 Fiat Argenta | |
| Make | BMW | Fiat |
| Model | 520 | Argenta |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1585 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 71.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 35 L |
