1996 BMW 520 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 520 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1996 BMW 520. (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW 520.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW 520. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW 520. (190 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 520 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 520 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2380 mm |