1996 BMW 523 vs. 1964 Holden EJ
To start off, 1996 BMW 523 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW 523 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 523 (170 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 523 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 523 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1964 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 523 (245 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 523 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 523 | 1964 Holden EJ | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 523 | EJ |
Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2680 mm |