1996 BMW 528 vs. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 BMW 528 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW 528 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 528 weights approximately 375 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1996 BMW 528 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW 528. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW 528 | 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 528 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2680 mm |
