1996 BMW 528 vs. 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 528. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 528 would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW 528 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 528 (201 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (145 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 248 kg more than 1996 BMW 528.
Because 1996 BMW 528 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW 528. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager (320 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW 528. (280 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW 528.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 528 | 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 528 | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 2425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1943 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |