1996 BMW 528 vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 528. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 528 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1996 BMW 528. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW 528. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 532 kg more than 1996 BMW 528. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW 528. (280 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW 528.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW 528 | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 528 | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 2127 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |
