1996 BMW 530 vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 BMW 530 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 530 (193 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 530 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 530 (280 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 530 | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | 530 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 64 L |