1996 BMW 535 vs. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 535. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 535 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 BMW 535 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 535 (235 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 535 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Arcadia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 535 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Arcadia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 BMW 535 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW 535. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 535 | 2000 Daewoo Arcadia | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | 535 | Arcadia |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 3206 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4960 mm |