1996 BMW 535 vs. 2002 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2002 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 535. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 535 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 611 more horse power than 1996 BMW 535. (232 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW 535. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 535 weights approximately 576 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 670 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW 535. (320 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW 535.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 535 | 2002 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | BMW | Lotec |
Model | 535 | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3430 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1150 mm |