1996 BMW 535 vs. 2004 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2500 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 535. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 535 would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 535 (232 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B2500. (204 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 535 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 43 kg more than 1996 BMW 535.
Because 2004 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW 535. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B2500 (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW 535. (320 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda B2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW 535.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 535 | 2004 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 535 | B2500 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3430 cc | 4031 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 323 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2990 mm |