1996 BMW 535 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 535. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 535 would be higher. At 3,430 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW 535 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 535 (232 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (215 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 535 should accelerate faster than 2005 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 132 kg more than 1996 BMW 535.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 535 (320 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 535 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

1996 BMW 535 2005 Cadillac CTS
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 535 CTS
Year Released 1996 2005
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3430 cc 3175 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 232 HP 215 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 4700 RPM 3400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1662 kg 1794 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2890 mm