1996 BMW 540 vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 540. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 540 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 540 weights approximately 800 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1996 BMW 540 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW 540. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW 540 | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | 540 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.4 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |
