1996 BMW 545 vs. 1967 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1996 BMW 545 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1996 BMW 545. (282 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW 545.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 545 (440 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 545 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 545 | 1967 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 545 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 101.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 76.3 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2750 mm |