1996 BMW 725 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 725. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 725 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW 725 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1996 BMW 725. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW 725.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW 725. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW 725. (280 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW 725.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW 725 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | BMW | Citroen |
| Model | 725 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 96 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
