1996 BMW 735 vs. 2001 Cadillac LMP
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 735. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 735 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1996 BMW 735. (232 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW 735.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW 735. (321 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW 735. 2001 Cadillac LMP has automatic transmission and 1996 BMW 735 has manual transmission. 1996 BMW 735 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Cadillac LMP will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW 735 | 2001 Cadillac LMP | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 735 | LMP |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 321 Nm | 401 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3090 mm |
