1996 BMW 735 vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 735. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 735 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 BMW 735 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW 735. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 735 (321 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 1996 BMW 735 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 735 | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 735 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 321 Nm | 190 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.9 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2380 mm |