1996 BMW 740 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1996 BMW 740 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 740 (282 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 740 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1996 BMW 740.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW 740. (420 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW 740.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 740 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 740 | 62 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 582 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1945 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 75 L |