1996 BMW 740 vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 740. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 740 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 BMW 740 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 740 (282 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 740 should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 740 (420 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 740 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW 740 | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | BMW | SsangYong |
| Model | 740 | Stavic |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 80 L |
