1996 BMW 740 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 740. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 740 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 740 (282 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 740 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 1996 BMW 740 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW 740. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 740 (420 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 740 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 740 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 740 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 57 L |