1996 BMW 840 vs. 1954 Jeep CJ

To start off, 1996 BMW 840 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 BMW 840 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 840 (282 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (136 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 840 should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 840 weights approximately 560 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW 840. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 840 (400 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 840 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.

Compare all specifications:

1996 BMW 840 1954 Jeep CJ
Make BMW Jeep
Model 840 CJ
Year Released 1996 1954
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3982 cc 3687 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 282 HP 136 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 325 Nm
Torque RPM 5100 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1740 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 3520 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2060 mm