1996 BMW 840 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1996 BMW 840 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 840 (282 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 840 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1996 BMW 840.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW 840 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 840 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 2095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3300 mm |
