1996 BMW 840 vs. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1996 BMW 840 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 BMW 840 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 840 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW 840 | 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | BMW | Studebaker |
| Model | 840 | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2980 mm |
