1996 BMW 840 vs. 1961 Dodge Polara
To start off, 1996 BMW 840 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1996 BMW 840. (282 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW 840. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 840 weights approximately 365 kg more than 1961 Dodge Polara.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW 840 | 1961 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | 840 | Polara |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 5907 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2960 mm |
