1996 BMW 840 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Express is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 840. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 840 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 BMW 840 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 840 (282 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Express. (197 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 840 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 440 kg more than 1996 BMW 840.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 840 (440 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Express. (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 840 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 840 | 2000 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 840 | Express |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4292 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 2330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3440 mm |