1996 BMW 840 vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 840. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 840 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 840 (282 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 840 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 585 kg more than 1996 BMW 840.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 840 (400 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 840 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 840 | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 840 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3982 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5100 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3510 mm |