1996 BMW 840 vs. 2006 Ford E-150
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 840. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 840 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 840 (282 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 840 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 840 (440 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 840 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 840 | 2006 Ford E-150 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 840 | E-150 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 132 L |