1996 BMW 840 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 840. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 840 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1996 BMW 840. (282 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW 840.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW 840. (400 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW 840.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW 840 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 840 | UTE |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3982 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |